Q:

The characteristic polynomial of the square matrix A is usually defined as rA(x) = det (xIn A)

0

The characteristic polynomial of the square matrix A is usually defined as rA(x) = det (xIn - A). Find a specific relationship between our characteristic polynomial, pA (x), and rA(x), give a proof of your relationship, and use this to explain why Theorem EMRCP can remain essentially unchanged with either definition. Explain the advantages of each definition over the other. (Computing with both definitions, for a 2 × 2 and a 3 × 3 matrix, might be a good way to start.)

All Answers

need an explanation for this answer? contact us directly to get an explanation for this answer

Note in the following that the scalar multiple of a matrix is equivalent to multiplying each of the rows by that scalar, so we actually apply Theorem DRCM multiple times below (and are passing up an opportunity to do a proof by induction in the process, which maybe you’d like to do yourself?).

pA (x) = det (A xIn)                                                            Definition CP

= det ((1)(xIn A))                                                Definition MSM

= (1)n det (xIn A)                                                Theorem DRCM

= (1)nrA(x)

Since the polynomials are scalar multiples of each other, their roots will be identical, so either polynomial could be used in Theorem EMRCP.

Computing by hand, our definition of the characteristic polynomial is easier to use, as you only need to subtract x down the diagonal of the matrix before computing the determinant. However, the price to be paid is that for odd values of n, the coefficient of xn is 1, while rA(x) always has the coefficient 1 for xn (we say rA(x) is “monic.”)

need an explanation for this answer? contact us directly to get an explanation for this answer

total answers (1)

Similar questions


need a help?


find thousands of online teachers now